What would be the best option
if the air demand required are 100%, 85% and 70%?
| Case (1): 100% Load (3066 cfm) |
Option (1):
Loading Power = 0.1643kW/cfm * 3066cfm * 8000
hours = 4,029,950 kWh
Unloading Power = 0 kWh
Total Energy Cost / year = 4,029,950 kWh * RM
0.21/kWh = RM 846,289
Option
(2)
Loading Power = 0.1672kW/cfm * 3066cfm * 8000
hours = 4,101,081kWh
Unloading Power = (3242 – 3066)/3242) *
50kW *2 * 8000 hours =43,430kWh
Total Energy Cost / year = (4,101,081kWh + 43,430kWh)
* RM 0.21/kWh = RM 870,347
Option
(3)
Loading Power = (0.1672kW/cfm*1621cfm) * 8000
+ 246kW * 8000 = 4,136,250 kWh
Unloading Power = 0 kWh
Total Energy Cost / year = (4,136,250kWh + 0 kWh)
* RM 0.21/kWh = RM 868,612
Comparison
for Maximum Load Demand:
For a Maximum (100%) Constant Plant Air demand
Option (1) is the most economical. A large and
higher efficiency compressor offers energy savings
during peak load periods.
| Case (2) 85% Load
(2,606 cfm) |
Option
(1)
Loading Power = 0.1643kW/cfm * 2,606cfm * 8000
hours = 3,425,326 kWh
Unloading Power = (3066-2606) / 3066) *150 kW
* 8000 hours = 180,039 kWh
Total Energy Cost / year = (3,425,326 + 180, 039)
kWh * RM 0.21/kWh = RM 757,126
Option
(2)
Loading Power = 0.1672kW/cfm * 2,606cfm * 8000
hours = 3,485,785 kWh
Unloading Power = ((3242 – 2606)/3242) *
50kW * 2 * 8000 hours = 156,940kWh
Total Energy Cost / year = (3,485,785kWh + 156,940kWh)
* RM 0.21/kWh = RM 764,972
Option
(3)
Loading Power = (0.1672kW/cfm*1621cfm) * 8000
+ 169kW * 8000 = 3,520,250 kWh
Unloading Power = 0 kWh
Total Energy Cost / year = (3,520,250 + 0) kWh
* RM 0.21/kWh = RM 739,252
Comparisons
for 85% Part Load Demand:
For a Part Air Load (85%) or fluctuating demand,
Option (3) is the most economical because it utilized
a medium size high energy efficiency air compressor
as base load and an additional Air compressor
with VSD as a top load compressor to meet the
requirements of air demand of the plant. VSD (Variable
Speed Drive) eliminates unloading energy wastage
and maximum energy savings can be achieved. Cost
of running one large compressor in Option (1)
is higher because of lower energy efficiency at
fluctuation and part load.
| Case (3) 70% Load (2,146.2 cfm) |
Option (1)
Loading
Power = 0.1643kW/cfm * 2,146.2cfm * 8000 hours
= 2,820,965 kWh
Unloading Power = ((3066 – 2146) / 3066)
* 150 kW * 8000 hours = 360,078 kWh
Total Energy Cost / year = (2,820,965 + 360,078)
kWh * RM 0.21/kWh = RM 668,019
Option
(2)
Loading Power = 0.1672kW/cfm * 2,146.2cfm * 8000
hours = 2,870,757kWh
Unloading Power = (3242 – 2146)/3242 * 50kW
* 2 * 8000 hours = 270,450kWh
Total Energy Cost / year = (2,870,757+ 270,450)
kWh * RM 0.21/kWh = RM 659,653
Option (3)
Loading
Power = (0.1672kW/cfm*1621cfm)*8000 + 90.7kW*8000
= 2,893,849 kWh
Unloading Power = 0 kWh
Total Energy Cost / year = (2,893,849 + 0) kWh
* RM 0.21/kWh = RM 607,708
Comparisons
for 70% Part Load Demand:
For a Part Air Load (70%) or fluctuating
demand, Option (3) is still the most economical
because it utilized a medium size high energy
efficiency air compressor as base load and an
additional Air compressor with VSD as a top load
compressor to meet the requirements of air demand
of the plant . VSD(Variable Speed Drive) eliminates
unloading energy wastage and maximum energy savings
can be achieved. Cost of running one large compressor
in Option (1) and Option (2) is higher because
of lower energy efficiency at part load.
Conclusion:
From the example above, we can conclude that the
selection of the compressor combination depends
on the type of demand whether it is constant demand
or fluctuating demand. For a constant demand,
one large size compressor just sufficient to meet
the demand of the air requirement and it is more
economical. However this is not usually the case
because user need margin to cater for losses Most
of the typical plant consumption is highly fluctuating
due to changes in production capacity. This air
consumption varies depend on the production shifts
, day, night, weekends public holidays and the
increase of production capacity On part load or
fluctuating demand it is more economical to run
with one medium size compressor on base load and
top up with an additional compressor fitted with
Variable Speed Drive because VSD eliminates unnecessary
unloading energy wastage.
|